Do you know about - We Need More Direct Democracy
Campaign Finance Reform! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.Representative government fails when corrupt politicians mostly serve corporate and other special interests. Then it is crucial for citizens to have direct democracy opportunities. This means having the right to place initiatives or referenda on ballots that can make new laws, amend constitutions, recall elected officials, or operate taxes and government spending.
What I said. It isn't outcome that the true about Campaign Finance Reform. You read this article for home elevators an individual wish to know is Campaign Finance Reform.How is We Need More Direct Democracy
Though many local and 24 state governments provide rules for some ballot measures and initiatives, they have been exiguous by diverse establishment, status quo political interests on the left and right that feel threatened by such populist habitancy power.
I was impressed by the new Wall road Journal article by John Fund: The Far Left's War on Direct Democracy. He made the point that direct democracy, though sorely needed, has been successfully crushed by ugly tactics from those interests that would rather use their money and affect to operate legislative and other government functions. They fear habitancy power. They know how to operate elections and manipulate voters. "Unfortunately, some special interests have declared war on the initiative process, using tactics fluctuating from restrictive laws to outright thuggery," said Fund.
I agree with Fund's summation: "Representative government will remain the enduring feature of American democracy, but the initiative process is a vital safety valve. ...attempts to arbitrarily curb the initiative, or to intimidate habitancy from exercising their right to participate, must be resisted. It's a civil liberties issue that should unite habitancy of good will on both the right and left."
If this sounds reasonable to you, then the suitable quiz, to ask of presidential candidates is straightforward: Do you retain providing more direct democracy opportunities?
Indeed, many habitancy want some way of creating a federal ballot initiative mechanism whereby the misdeeds or inaction of government could be addressed by Americans voting directly to get the transparent and accountable government and efficient collective policies they want. A national ballot measure to end the Iraq war would have succeeded in 2006, for example. Putting Democrats in operate of Congress did not work. Do we need the potential to recall a president because of dishonesty, incompetence and wrongheaded policies? Yes.
Also reconsider that the two-party plutocracy has been able to stifle political opposition by production third party and independent candidates unable to grasp any real power, as they can do in most other democracies.
In mental about direct democracy I was reminded of the all too prevalent view that Barack Obama will challenge the traditional, money dominated two-party operate of Washington politics. So, I pose this challenge to Obama: If you truly laid out a force for fixing a divisive and ineffective political system, then why don't you explicitly come out in favor of creating more direct democracy opportunities? Why not condemn all attempts to crush ballot measures and initiatives? And why not help start a national conference of the possibility of a federal ballot initiative mechanism?
When over 80 percent of Americans see the nation on the wrong track it is fair to quit that representative government has failed. The two-party plutocracy has too much power. This is the ideal time to recognize the limits of electoral, representative democracy and become an advocate for more direct democracy.
President Theodore Roosevelt, in 1912, wisely observed "I believe in the Initiative and Referendum, which should be used not to destroy representative government, but to literal, it whenever it becomes misrepresentative." Direct democracy is all about converting the belief of sovereignty of we the habitancy into reality.
It comes to this: Should we be article to put our faith in elected representative or should we put it in ourselves? When you vote for candidates you don't put your faith in yourself, you put it in them. Haven't we been disappointed enough in those elected? We have less to fear from the will of the majority than from the actions of dishonest, corrupt and plutocracy-serving elected officials.
For political reform seeking Americans the litmus test for presidential candidates should be either they retain more direct democracy. If Obama is not just about rhetorical change, but a true reformer of the political system, then we need to hear from him on this issue.
Let him interpret either or not he supports what Ralph Nader does, who has said that presidential candidates should "put front and town empowering the American habitancy in direct democracy format so they can move in when their so-called representatives cave in to the interests of big business. ...Campaign finance reform has got to go hand in hand with direct democracy like initiative, referendum, recall." His current platform says that we need "more direct democracy reflecting the preamble to our constitution which starts with 'we the people,' and not 'we the corporations.'"
Can you fantasize Obama saying these things? I can't.
I hope you obtain new knowledge about Campaign Finance Reform. Where you can put to easy use in your day-to-day life. And most importantly, your reaction is Campaign Finance Reform.Read more.. We Need More Direct Democracy. View Related articles related to Campaign Finance Reform. I Roll below. I have suggested my friends to assist share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share We Need More Direct Democracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment