Do you know about - The Bush religious doctrine Works
Campaign Finance Reports! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.The Bush philosophy works - when it is applied properly. It follows in the same path laid out by past Us hegemonic aspirations at new world orders. Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy [all Democrats]; and Reagan had their own doctrines. Past calls to reform the world or combat evil in discrete forms all the time involved moral clarity; troops power; financial resources; and finally patience and intelligence. The Bush Doctrine, aimed at fascistic Islam, and 'draining the swamps' of the Middle East is no different.
What I said. It is not outcome that the true about Campaign Finance Reports. You check out this article for home elevators an individual want to know is Campaign Finance Reports.How is The Bush religious doctrine Works
The Bush philosophy is of policy much maligned. Criticism of the philosophy comes from all over the ideological map and most of the Criticism is invalid. The media and educational establishments of policy rejoice and narrative every dissenting view - but offer nothing in the place of the Bush Doctrine. The Bush philosophy is the right way send - but only if troops might is used properly, which for 3.5 years in Iraq [as many of us knuckle dragging 'neo-cons' screamed], it was not.
What is the Bush philosophy and why doesn't the media narrative what the philosophy is, in its entirety?
The Bush philosophy is based on a realistic assessment of the challenge posed by radical Islam. It can best be summarised by a speech Bush gave on September 20th 2001: 'We have seen their kind before. They are the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the twentieth century. By sacrificing human life to serve their radical visions, by abandoning every value execpt the will to power, they corollary in the path of fascism, Nazism, and totalitarianism. And they will corollary that path all the way to where it ends - in history's unmarked grave of discarded lies.'
This is brilliant. In one paragraph Bush summarizes what is at hand with the radical elements of Islam. First, Islam is an ideology of 'will to power' [male Muslims must rule, Islam must dominate etc]; and is inherently fascist [no free will]. Second, Islam follows Nazism and Communism in its commitment to eradicate civilisation, justice, morality and the juridical personality. Third, Islam for all its murderous pagan energy, is doomed to failure - as long as we can recognise the ideology for what it is.
This one paragraph is the best short summation of what is at stake.
Now flowing from this rationale comes the Bush Doctrine. The philosophy itself rejects all previously inept and failed attempts to address, appease, rationalise or presume with Islam. For over 50 years, discrete Us policies have tried and failed, to whether modernise Islam, comprise it, or seek an chamber with it.
Various 'isms' - realism, liberalism, and internationalism former among them - were tried and they failed. The Bush philosophy broke with all past frameworks and adopted a new, and singularly logical plan to deal with Islam - use exogenous force to change radical, terror sponsoring Muslim regimes, their society, and finally their culture.
By definition the Bush philosophy is ineluctably a military-based option. troops power, combined with economics, new pluralist democratic structures, and at some level, a new culture, must or at least has the potential to, refashion the states of the Middle East. It does not wish a troops work of every state, but only the key states which will form the basis for regional-wide change.
The Bush philosophy is bold and risky - but finally right. As Bush said numerous times between 2001 and 2004 - normally on deaf media ears - you cannot wait until threats are imminent. By this he meant that terrorists and fascists normally don't write love letters to their victims identifying the time and place of the next tragic, murderous rampage. They normally just kill and talk later. In a compressed world of lethal weapons of all sizes and shapes, and with inter-continental logistics potential available to even the poorest of states, waiting around until murder strikes is plainly an abdication of responsibility and ensures carnage.
The Bush philosophy then is premised on pre-emptive strikes, an assertion of national privilege and security, and the confidence that forcing democratic change onto the fascist regimes in the Islamic world, is the best hope for long term international peace. He is right. Every other policy tried by conservatives and liberals alike in the past 50 years, regarding Islam, has failed.
Realism and balance of power politics [play Iraq off against Iran for example], failed. There are many who whine that the Us created Hussein or the Taliban for instance, in the American zeal to counter Russian Communism. Liberal internationalism in the guise of the Un, or endless polite talking shops, have been useless endeavours, never once stopping Islamic terror and violence [see Israel as an example]. Appeasement and isolationism, as witnessed by Reagan's resignation from Lebanon in 1983 after hundreds of Us marines were killed by Hizbollah over a 6 month duration spellbinding multiple attacks; or Clinton's cowardly escort in Somalia and East Africa, only emboldened the enemy.
So what else is left? Not much. You can't pull up the drawbridge and hide behind porous national borders. Neither can you outsource your foreign policy [as the Us State branch does] to the Europeans or the Un. Neither is trustworthy. With only a few countries possessing any troops with power corner capability[France, Israel and the Uk are the others]; the Us is forced into unilateral action.
Invading and draining the swamp of Iraq is the right policy. If the Us had used allowable troops force and fought the Iraq war to win, Iraq today would be stable. At least after 3 years they finally got the right ideas and the right generals to do what should have been done from day one. Wmd has been found [along with sales of Hussein's stock identified, going to the Russians, discrete Arab states and Syria]. Iraqi terror financing has been halted. Iraq now has a government that is our ally. And radical Islam has most likely lost 60.000 men killed and scores more wounded. Iraq is a big defeat for the Islamists.
Along with the work of Afghanistan some preeminent things have happened. Iran is now encircled production an invasion literally easier and quicker. The 'winds of change' are slowing blowing throughout the Middle East. The Arabs and Muslims now perceive that the Us is in the region to stay - and to reform. This essential fact means that additional societal, cultural and economic changes will literally follow. The fight against Islam has been taken to the heartland of the Arab cult. The pschological effects on Islamic populations, of winning in Iraq and Afghanistan and spellbinding Iran directly, will be enormous.
Liberal internationalism, and the cult of politically exact Marxism, is a scam. There is nothing spellbinding in ignoring reality and pretending that the world is a multi-cult paradise and that Islam means peace. Preposterous. It is also morally hypocritical.
Us 'allies', excluding Britain, but along with the weak militaries of most of the Eu, and Canada did not join the Us invasion of Iraq with any degree of force or troops power, for the following reasons: 1. They possess no military. 2. The Eu, Russia and China had enterprise interests, along with oil rights, worth billions per annum that could not be disturbed. 3. Iraq was the Uno's largest ever earnings program and the Uno stole about billion in monies from this program over 10 years; and 4. Domestic politics in the socialist and relativist nations [each with sizeable Arab and Muslim lobby groups], means anti-Americanism pays off at the polls and in selection campaigns. The opposition to the Iraq invasion was not based on moral grounds.
Islamic terror necessitates a multi-level, and involved response - but it is still, as in times past, primarily a troops and financial response which will ensure victory. Diplomacy without power is useless. Since 9-11, 60.000 habitancy have been killed in acts of Muslim violence and 90.000 wounded. This excludes Darfur and Iraq. The Bush philosophy of 2001-2002 was right. Islam is the natural heir to the fascist-totalitarian ideologies of Nazism and Communism.
In the Middle East and elsewhere Islam has proven itself a failure and if not reformed, Islamic philosophy will only produce more fascist tyranny, hopeless economies and hate sated youth dying for martyrdom. Smashing directly or indirectly Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia which spend each, 0 million; $ 1-2 billion; and -4 billion respectively per annum in sponsoring terror and fascist Islam around the world, should be the whole one foreign policy mandate of the West, after stabilising Iraq and Afghanistan.
There is nothing wrong with a crusading, imperialist policy. Especially if our national safety is at risk. After all the Arabs under the banner of Islam, have been waging war against 'the others' for 1400 years. Acting like children will not make the nightmare go away. The Bush philosophy is the mature and responsible heir to policies espoused by Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy and Reagan. There is no other option.
I hope you obtain new knowledge about Campaign Finance Reports. Where you'll be able to offer utilization in your everyday life. And most of all, your reaction is Campaign Finance Reports.Read more.. The Bush religious doctrine Works. View Related articles associated with Campaign Finance Reports. I Roll below. I actually have suggested my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share The Bush religious doctrine Works.
No comments:
Post a Comment